Hi,
Is it possible only print certain entries of my bibtex reference.
For example I want to make a table that gives an overview of a list of journals:
Something like:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[oxford, citefull=all]{jurabib}
\begin{document}
\bibliographystyle{jurabib}
\begin{tabular}{ccc}
Paper&Keyword&Comment\\
\hline
\citet{1}&\citekeyword{1}&\citecomment{1}\\
\end{tabular}
\nobibliography{litteraturoversigt}
\end{document}
where "\citekeyword{1}" references to the keyword of citation 1.
Thanks in advance!
Regards
Hans
BibTeX, biblatex and biber ⇒ print special entries of the bibtex database
print special entries of the bibtex database
Hi,
If I understand you correct, you should use the natbib package.
Checkout http://merkel.zoneo.net/Latex/natbib.php for more info.
You might be particularly interested in \citeindexfalse and \citeindextrue.
Bye,
jocom
If I understand you correct, you should use the natbib package.
Checkout http://merkel.zoneo.net/Latex/natbib.php for more info.
You might be particularly interested in \citeindexfalse and \citeindextrue.
Bye,
jocom
Re: print special entries of the bibtex database
The original problem as posted by hanshdk is also what I want to do.
I wish to include additional information on an article in the bibtex file (e.g. a short summary). Next, I wish to include that summary into my text by calling something like \summary{bibtex_key}.
I've taken a look at the suggestion by jocom to use \citeindexfalse and \citeindextrue in the natbib package. However, I can't see how this can be used to resolve the issue.
So, could anybody either further elaborate on jocim's solution or suggest a new one?
I wish to include additional information on an article in the bibtex file (e.g. a short summary). Next, I wish to include that summary into my text by calling something like \summary{bibtex_key}.
I've taken a look at the suggestion by jocom to use \citeindexfalse and \citeindextrue in the natbib package. However, I can't see how this can be used to resolve the issue.
So, could anybody either further elaborate on jocim's solution or suggest a new one?