I had acknowledged from your previous replies (except for the 16pt I had forgotten), but it now displays an output as I want it to be displayed: isn't it in fine what is wanted? I have no error at document's building (even if it is here a subjective criterium). Anyway, you helped me and I could not have made it without your help.localghost wrote:Excuse me, but it seems that you haven't learned from my previous replies.
This issue is solved from my point of view now.
Thanks. It worked.
The problem is solved.