LaTeX.org

\documentclass{article}
\newcommand*{\hello}{
  Hello, world!}
\newcommand*{\goodbye}{%
  Goodbye, world!}

\begin{document}
\noindent
This is the \hello\ command. Saying\hello\ is what we are doing.
This is the \goodbye\ command. Saying\goodbye\ is what we are doing.
\end{document}

\newcommand*{\hello}{\relax
  Hello, world!}

\newcommand*{\hello}{Hello, world!}

Here's a reason for the percent sign (i.e., a comment, which has the effect of eating the spaces until the next line); compare the following:
[code]
\documentclass{article}
\newcommand*{\hello}{
Hello, world!}
\newcommand*{\goodbye}{%
Goodbye, world!}

\begin{document}
\noindent
This is the \hello\ command. Saying\hello\ is what we are doing.
This is the \goodbye\ command. Saying\goodbye\ is what we are doing.
\end{document}
[/code]
See how the first one has a space, even though I didn't put one in the text? That's why the % signs are used. I could also have ended the line with a command, like so:
[code]
\newcommand*{\hello}{\relax
Hello, world!}
[/code]
That would do the same thing. I could also have left off the end-of-line character, like this:
[code]
\newcommand*{\hello}{Hello, world!}
[/code]

[quote="kaiserkarl13"][latex]\newcommand\routine[4]{}[/latex] will define a "long" command "\routine" that has four arguments. The starred version does the same except the command is not "long" (i.e., the four arguments cannot contain paragraph breaks). If your command works with the star, you should use the star.

Your last example simply defines "\rountine" but expects no arguments (and thus it won't eat the four arguments following it like the other two will).[/quote]
Thank you!

Actually, I had meant to ask about
\newcommand\routine[4]{%

My question was about why we would need the %. All it does is tell the compiler that what follows on the line is not code, right? So why does it keep cropping up? I would think that \newcommand\routine[4]{ would be enough.

Thanks again!

-Dan

[latex]\newcommand\routine[4]{}[/latex] will define a "long" command "\routine" that has four arguments. The starred version does the same except the command is not "long" (i.e., the four arguments cannot contain paragraph breaks). If your command works with the star, you should use the star.

Your last example simply defines "\rountine" but expects no arguments (and thus it won't eat the four arguments following it like the other two will).

I'm playing a bit of catch up on my questions.

There are a couple of quick questions I have. I have seen a couple of \newcommand codes:
1. \newcommand\routine[4]{

2. \newcommand*\routine[4]{

3. \newcommand\rountine{%

As usual, I can't find anything on the net about a distinction. For all of the applications I've been working with, they seem to work identically, but I'm sure there's some kind of difference between them.

Thanks!

-Dan